1 |
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 20:33:49 -0500 |
3 |
> R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> In any case it is my understanding that the issue is that simple. It's |
6 |
>> the reason torrents and magnet links exist, and why there are no legal |
7 |
>> claims possible against websites which host magnet links. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The entire court case against PirateBay was based on that. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> And the court case was won against PirateBay |
12 |
> |
13 |
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirate_Bay_trial#Trial_and_courtroom_charges |
14 |
> |
15 |
>> The court found that the defendants were all guilty of accessory to |
16 |
>> crime against copyright law, strengthened by the commercial and |
17 |
>> organized nature of the activity. |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
This was normal torrents, not magnet links? Was the complaint retried |
21 |
against someone else who was hosting a magnet link website? |
22 |
|
23 |
I suspect the links in ebuilds are more like torrent files, in which |
24 |
case I think it makes sense to wait to be contacted to remove the |
25 |
links. Otherwise, lots of other precautions should be taken, such as |
26 |
disclaiming liability for acts of terrorism perpetrated using Gentoo. |