Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April)
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:05:32
Message-Id: pan.2007.04.14.01.59.03@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> posted
2 20070413203309.7df28d50@snowflake, excerpted below, on Fri, 13 Apr 2007
3 20:33:09 +0100:
4
5 > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:06:44 -0400
6 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
7 >> > If a test suite isn't viable, the ebuild should be RESTRICTing test
8 >> > anyway.
9 >>
10 >> which doesnt apply here ... some packages have ridiculous awesome
11 >> coverage for their source code and take much longer to run than even
12 >> compile the package
13 >>
14 >> care to force mysql test suites on everyone ? php ? gcc ? binutils ?
15 >
16 > A separate solution is needed for those anyway, since there're plenty of
17 > people running with FEATURES=test.
18
19 FEATURES=bigtest ??
20
21 Interesting idea. Then default test to on and bigtest to off, with
22 appropriate user descriptions and developer guidelines for when use of
23 "bigtest" is appropriate (extra deps, long runtime, etc.).
24
25 --
26 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
27 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
28 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
29
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list