| 1 |
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:16:58 +0200 |
| 2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > > What would you do away with? Being able to virtualize |
| 8 |
> > > > > packages without recompiling everything that depends on them? |
| 9 |
> > > > |
| 10 |
> > > > Well that's never worked properly or consistently to begin with |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > Please answer the question? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > That does answer the question |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It doesn't. The question is "What would you do away with?" and you |
| 17 |
> didn't list the things you would do away with. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Please answer the question? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Dynamic dependencies, || dependencies (in favour of a heavily |
| 22 |
restricted, non-abusable alternative) and REQUIRED_USE would be an |
| 23 |
excellent start. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives