| 1 |
http://viewcvstest.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0001.html?rev=1.8&view=log |
| 2 |
meh, when it comes down to it... isn't this good enough of a change log? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 12/13/05, Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Tue, 2005-13-12 at 21:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:53:45 -0500 Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |
| 7 |
> > wrote: |
| 8 |
> > | Why not just modify GlEP 1 ? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Going back and retroactively modifying standards is icky, and it |
| 11 |
> > *still* doesn't address the issue of documenting why the change was |
| 12 |
> > made. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And why not just adding a changelog to the glep explaining the changes? |
| 15 |
> I really don't like to idea of having to read 8 gleps to find out how to |
| 16 |
> write a glep ... and calling it glep 1.a is a good idea.. or 1.1 |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> -- |
| 19 |
> Olivier Crête |
| 20 |
> tester@g.o |
| 21 |
> Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives