Archives
Archives
| From: | Matthijs van der Vleuten <zr40.nl@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] | ||
| Date: | Sun, 08 May 2005 20:28:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 31a24e290505081329428b3ed4@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] by Luke-Jr |
||
| 1 | On 5/8/05, Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 | > On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 | > > The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo |
| 6 | > adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing as |
| 7 | > it's not a bug in KDE... |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Short version: It's the ebuild that's unstable, not KDE itself. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |