| 1 |
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 11:28 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not |
| 4 |
> > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries |
| 5 |
> Because of the number of `file` calls needed to identify stripped and |
| 6 |
> non-stripped binaries, I'd say... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Come to think of it portage-2.1_NEXT will require >=pax-utils-0.1.10 |
| 9 |
(auto fixing evil rpaths) which has support for '*.a' files now |
| 10 |
(spanky rules). |
| 11 |
We can probably obsolete the need to call 'file' all together now in |
| 12 |
prepstrip. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Heres a patch also which should help you track down offending programs |
| 15 |
as they occur. should catch all cases of 'install -s' also. |
| 16 |
http://tinderbox.x86.dev.gentoo.org/portage/local/patches/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-gentoo-strip-safe.patch |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
solar <solar@g.o> |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives