| 1 |
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 12:44 +0000, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran's right on this one. It may have been a bug in portage, now |
| 3 |
> fixed, but at least until a stable current release media set, a working |
| 4 |
> PMS can't change the EAPI-0 definition to fail with portage on the old |
| 5 |
> release media, however stale it might be. If a current release happens |
| 6 |
> before PMS EAPI-0 finalization, this could possibly be subject to debate, |
| 7 |
> but until then, it just doesn't work, however much we might wish it could. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
No, he isn't. For one, we're talking make.conf, not the profiles. |
| 10 |
Second, there's a newer official (and stable) media set. Sorry if you |
| 11 |
don't like the "beta" moniker, which applies to the media set. After |
| 12 |
all, does a package suddenly become less stable because it is included |
| 13 |
in a tarball that has "beta" in the *FILE NAME* ? I don't think so. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 17 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 18 |
Games Developer |
Archives