| 1 |
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 04:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being |
| 4 |
> > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of |
| 5 |
> > keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how |
| 6 |
> > about the following addition to the Social Contract? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > <heading>We will be run by the Development Community</> |
| 9 |
> > Gentoo will be run by the development community. We will never allow |
| 10 |
> > ourselves to be reliant upon a single sponsor or corporation. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the wording is way |
| 13 |
> too vague to do anything but cause confusion and people to spout long winded |
| 14 |
> rants, seems like useless nitpicking about an issue that doesnt exist |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Supposedly >80% of our stuff is hosted in one building, where would we |
| 17 |
find ourselves were this building to building to burn to the ground? Get |
| 18 |
flooded? |
Archives