| 1 |
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:04:14 +0300 |
| 2 |
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:30:22 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:07:48 +0000 |
| 8 |
> > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:12:37 +0100 |
| 11 |
> > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 12 |
> > > > RDEPEND="dev-libs/libfoo[${MULTILIB_USEDEP}] |
| 13 |
> > > > dev-libs/libbar[ssl,${MULTILIB_USEDEP}]" |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > This looks like it might be a bit fragile. Is it something better |
| 16 |
> > > addressed by an EAPI extension? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > I have no idea. This one's clear and simple. Not sure how you could be |
| 19 |
> > able to do that better in EAPI. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> EAPI might allow lib[multiple?][use?][flags?] as an alias of [multiple?,use?,flags?]. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I still don't think that would be really helpful. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
dev-libs/libfoo[ssl][${MULTILIB_USEDEP}] |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
is IMO just more confusing than the usual [ssl,...] -- people start |
| 28 |
thinking 'does it mean something special?' |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Unless you mean adding the brackets to the variable itself -- but that |
| 31 |
will be just scary... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
dev-libs/libfoo${MULTILIB_USEDEP} |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Best regards, |
| 37 |
Michał Górny |
Archives