Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving functionality out of portage and into the tree
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:17:57
Message-Id: 1091171893.27042.1.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving functionality out of portage and into the tree by Ned Ludd
1 On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 14:54, Ned Ludd wrote:
2 > I fully support this as long as I'm in said group that can commit on
3 > these things or get a speedy response from somebody else that is.
4 > If initially if it's going to be limited I'd suggest the base-system,
5 > portage and toolchain herds.
6
7 I'd suggest adding the qa herd/project/whatever to this list. Hopefully,
8 they all have a solid grasp of how things work. (If they didn't, how
9 could they do QA?)
10 --
11 Donnie Berkholz
12 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature