Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jonathan Kelly <j0n@×××××××.au>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 19:28:41
Message-Id: 20020806102652.4e898087.j0n@tpg.com.au
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing by Ryan Phillips
1 On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:17:54 -0700
2 Ryan Phillips <rphillips@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > * Rigo <rigo@××××.nl> [2002-08-05 08:22]:
5 > > Same here... ( See Bug No. 5956)
6 > >
7 > > Rigo
8 > >
9 > > Op ma 05-08-2002, om 08:12 schreef Jonathan Kelly:
10 > > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
11 > > > Ryan Phillips <rphillips@g.o> wrote:
12 > > >
13 > > > > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into
14 > > > > the portage tree. Povray's package has changed to an autoconf
15 > > > > system, and the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it
16 > > > > to compile correctly (atleast on my machine).
17 > > > >
18 > > > > Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I
19 > > > > haven't tested it), and PPC needs to be tested. If anyone finds
20 > > > > any bugs, please open a bug report and direct it to my attention.
21 > > > >
22 > > > > As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included
23 > > > > into this version of povray. I have disabled it by default
24 > > > > (/etc/povray.conf). Is this wise?
25 > > >
26 > > > I think there is something weird going on here related to the fact
27 > > > that the 3.5 tarball has the same name is the 3.1g tarball .... it
28 > > > downloads povuni_s.tgz from ibiblio and then starts a restart
29 > > > operation from ftp.povray.org
30 > > >
31 >
32 > Ibiblio wasn't synced correctly... The file should be around 6 MB and
33 > should be ok to download from ibilio now.
34 >
35
36 Does this mean you can't downgrade to 3.1g as the filenames are the same?
37 Has anyone politely complained about the tarballs not including a version
38 number??
39
40 Cheers.
41 Jonathan Kelly.