| 1 |
Am Montag, 30. Juni 2014, 10:21:17 schrieb Tony Vroon: |
| 2 |
> On 29/06/14 16:49, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
> > virtual/perl-Switch |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> No, stop that right now. |
| 6 |
> Bug #511874 needs to be actually fixed: |
| 7 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511874 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The explanation was closed as a duplicate, which it isn't: |
| 10 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496278 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You are breaking working installs here and I will not stand for it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
* What am I breaking? |
| 15 |
All in-tree revdeps have been fixed to depend on perl-core/Switch |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
* What is the point of keeping a virtual with only one provider? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
* As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should still go stable. |
| 20 |
Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about future stabilizations, and |
| 21 |
the virtual only had ~arch reverse deps). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 27 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 28 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives