| 1 |
On Sunday 02 April 2006 21:28, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> last time i recall following the gtk/gtk2 stuff, the idea was that in the |
| 3 |
> future to move to a gtk/gtk1 situation ... but this was back when Spider |
| 4 |
> was The Man, so i guess people forgot about that |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
No, see the whole thread Harald references in his email. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> > it should be more the question, if there's anyone supporting |
| 9 |
> > Gtk1 upstream with regards to security issues etc.. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> and when such a situation arises, the solution may to simply drop the |
| 12 |
> optional support. such a situation has not arose, so using such |
| 13 |
> hypothetical examples is meaningless. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The problem is that no one is working on the code, so the chances for black |
| 16 |
hats to find something they can abuse for a long time are to consider. The |
| 17 |
situation is always given. It's just the question, when and if the good guys |
| 18 |
get to know about it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Carsten |
Archives