Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 21:50:13
Message-Id: 4FBD5B42.7090809@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Dan Douglas
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 05/23/2012 11:14 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
5 > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 04:47:04 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote:
6 >> 2. rsync generation is NOT going away. Users will still be using
7 >> it.
8
9 First, I'd stick with the current rsync to spread the tree (mirror
10 work and mirrors+regular rsync users shouldn't notice any backend
11 switch at all).
12
13
14 > Would users have a way of gaining read-only access? This would be
15 > EXTREMELY helpful.
16 Sure, this would be possible like any other git checkout
17 (layman-git-overlays, github.com, etc.).
18
19 Please compare (browsing source and access description)
20 http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/
21 http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git
22
23
24 - --
25 Gentoo Dev
26 http://xmw.de/
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
29 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
30
31 iF4EAREIAAYFAk+9W0EACgkQknrdDGLu8JADaQD+KC6cLJ5LqpNrKkNEBT1kAvJW
32 xn+ZcfcMGJzc8GPyQZAA/jKug+5/DlDAHVGBIjAJOi9xf4EFqroL4eyPY8SD2neh
33 =dvFZ
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>