Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OT Foundation <-> Council was -> Nominations for council
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:34:39
Message-Id: 1212791671.3704.62.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] OT Foundation <-> Council was -> Nominations for council by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 15:23 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 >
3 > Like comparing Gentoo to a single-brained animal with multiple heads?
4
5 But that it is. You have two entities, that both are related to Gentoo
6 in some form. Overlapping membership, staff, interests, etc.
7
8 > No comparisons are perfect, but that doesn't mean there's nothing to learn
9 > from them because we're so unique.
10
11 I agree 100%. My logic is cherry pick what we like from each. Thus ideas
12 from Gnome Foundation ( paid business bull$hit "advisory" members ),
13 some from BSD Foundation ( dev travel grants, equipment/infra funding ),
14 and some from Debian ( Debconf )
15
16 > It might be part of restricted income contributions on the profit & loss
17 > report.
18
19 I believe it has to be accounted for in some form as "in kind"
20 donations. Non tangible goods and services that still have a value.
21 Definitely if we receive them on a re-occurring basis. Even more so if
22 other companies are using that as write off as a charitable expenses.
23 IRS will want to compare what they are deducting is showing up on the
24 other end. :)
25
26 --
27 William L. Thomson Jr.
28 amd64/Java/Trustees
29 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] OT Foundation <-> Council was -> Nominations for council Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>