| 1 |
On 11/01/18 03:18, Benda Xu wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi MJ, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Not entirely as a #gentoo-nit-pick .. I'm slightly unclear on the |
| 7 |
>> different between 2.6.16+ and 2.6.32+ .. should this potentially be |
| 8 |
>> 2.16.16-32 perhaps [2.6.16~32 even] or is this more obvious only to me, |
| 9 |
>> and more confusing to others.... |
| 10 |
> 2.6.16+ means that it can be used in any cases when the kernel is newer |
| 11 |
> than 2.6.16. For example, you can use it on linux-4.14, just with |
| 12 |
> unnecessary backward compatibility code. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Besides, with the newest profile, kernel-3.2+, the ending kernel version |
| 15 |
> is not known. We will have to rename it when glibc jumps if the profile |
| 16 |
> is named with a version range. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Hope this addresses your concern. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Cheers, |
| 22 |
> Benda |
| 23 |
Thanks, that does make sense! |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
MJE |
Archives