Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: base-system@g.o, multilib@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] rfc: multilib and fhs 3
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:48:33
Message-Id: 20151010224815.GA15801@linux1
1 All,
2
3 fhs 3.0 was approved in June this year [1] [2].
4
5 The piece of it that I want to bring up is the lib and libxx
6 directories, both in / and /usr. The way I read the fhs, /lib and
7 /usr/lib should hold the files for the default abi and /libxx and
8 /usr/libxx should hold the files for the alternate abis. In earlier fhs,
9 there was an exception for amd64 which stated that the default libraries
10 should be in /lib64 and /usr/lib64. However, that exception is now gone.
11
12 I know there was discussion/work in the past on removing the lib->lib64
13 symlinks on amd64, but I don't remember what happened to that
14 discussion. So, I would like to bring it up again and get the info.
15
16 What would it take for us to remove the lib->lib64 links?
17
18 What would it take for us to do this migration on live systems?
19
20 William
21
22 [1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/en/FHS
23 [2] http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs-3.0.html

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: multilib and fhs 3 Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: multilib and fhs 3 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: multilib and fhs 3 Jason Zaman <perfinion@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: multilib and fhs 3 "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: multilib and fhs 3 "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>