| 1 |
On 2018.01.11 01:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Does being 'struck off' the list in this way apply to devs, |
| 3 |
> including |
| 4 |
> > Council and comrel members? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So far noone has even considered "striking" devs off the list. If this |
| 7 |
> even |
| 8 |
> were to happen ever, it would have to be backed by a full comrel team |
| 9 |
> decision |
| 10 |
> / vote. And these don't happen often, don't happen quickly, and don't |
| 11 |
> happen |
| 12 |
> lightly. (I much prefer fixing the glibc ebuilds, horrible as these |
| 13 |
> may be.) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> We have now an imperfect solution to an unneccessary problem. If |
| 16 |
> anyone can |
| 17 |
> come up with a better solution (that is still an improvement over |
| 18 |
> doing |
| 19 |
> nothing), I'm all ears. List moderation is not one, since a) it still |
| 20 |
> hasn't |
| 21 |
> been implemented technically, b) even if that were done, we would |
| 22 |
> still |
| 23 |
> require an active moderation team, and c) then we start bikeshedding |
| 24 |
> about the |
| 25 |
> moderation rules. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 30 |
> dilfridge@g.o |
| 31 |
> Gentoo Linux developer |
| 32 |
> (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Andreas, |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Does removing non @gentoo.org email address from the ML not require |
| 38 |
that process too? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Gentoo does not have any other disiplinary process than the action by |
| 41 |
comrel that you describe. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
Regards, |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Roy Bamford |
| 47 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 48 |
elections |
| 49 |
gentoo-ops |
| 50 |
forum-mods |
Archives