| 1 |
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ah, I think I see what you mean now. That's actually a bit more |
| 3 |
> predictable and requires less action on behalf of the user. I'd like |
| 4 |
> to add that, if we do this, could Portage output which USE flags were |
| 5 |
> being automatically added? We already have USE changes indicated with |
| 6 |
> the % suffix, would that be enough in your opinion? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It might not hurt to have portage display some kind of prefix that |
| 9 |
means the flag is enabled implicitly. That could be useful whether it |
| 10 |
is changing or not. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In any case, none of this will happen unless somebody builds it. :) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Maybe toss in mix-in support while we're at it. :) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Rich |
Archives