| 1 |
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 11:39, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> 28.2.2006, 17:24:21, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 3 |
> > If you don't agree with the contents, why didn't you raise your |
| 4 |
> > opposition earlier? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I don't feel any need to raise opposition against some unofficial manual, |
| 7 |
> what would be the point in that? I'm raising my hand against silently |
| 8 |
> incorporating parts of it (that affect a lot of stuff in the tree) into |
| 9 |
> official docs without a proper discussion, even more so that they are being |
| 10 |
> claimed as an official QA policy now. Documents located in private devspace |
| 11 |
> of some devs are non-official and noone checks their contents for |
| 12 |
> correctness, they are private activity of those devs. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
input was solicited from the developer community before about ciaranm's |
| 15 |
unofficial manual with notes that the plan was to incorporate it piece by |
| 16 |
piece into the official dev handbook |
| 17 |
-mike |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives