| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Plus for stuff like gcc, it's very much an arch decision, not a package |
| 3 |
> maintainer decision. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
gcc was just the first example which came to my mind -- you can replace it with |
| 6 |
every other big piece of software that needs more testing than just 30 days. Or |
| 7 |
the other way around: There might be a new, not very popular package, so the |
| 8 |
maintainer didn't get any bug reports (=it works fine), but there might be a too |
| 9 |
little user community that you really could claim it rock-solid stable. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Simon Stelling |
| 13 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead |
| 14 |
blubb@g.o |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives