| 1 |
William Hubbs posted on Thu, 31 May 2012 14:54:50 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:42PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 4 |
>> - You have a commit, that you want to put into the Gentoo tree. |
| 5 |
>> - You have already pushed it to your github, signed |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If I have a github tree, that would probably be because I didn't have |
| 8 |
> push access to the official tree, so signing the commit probably |
| 9 |
> isn'tgoing to matter; I would expect that a gentoo dev who has push |
| 10 |
> access to the tree would sign the commit when it is put into the gentoo |
| 11 |
> tree. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't know what's going to happen to all the overlays with the main |
| 14 |
tree switch to git, but won't that break various "overlay first" |
| 15 |
policies, say for the kde overlay? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Of course, if all the official overlays are converted to git branches of |
| 18 |
the main tree... but won't they still require rebasing as they've already |
| 19 |
been pushed? (This assumes your workaround idea doesn't work. If it |
| 20 |
does, great!) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 24 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 25 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives