| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 13:40:18 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| > Using the normal profiles isn't an option unless they're changed to |
| 4 |
| > include virtual/portage in the system set instead of |
| 5 |
| > sys-apps/portage. That's the key change we're interested in here -- |
| 6 |
| > that the system set not pull in portage when paludis is being used |
| 7 |
| > instead. |
| 8 |
| |
| 9 |
| Is there a problem about both of them being there? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes. Portage has a few zillion deps more than Paludis. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 15 |
Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives