| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Ok, so to me that still makes sense. So you just still motivated to me |
| 4 |
why a separate /usr is still a good idea, not why it should be merged. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
There are some arbitrary rules there that doesn't make sense. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The real question then really is, why are we merging into /usr and not |
| 9 |
back into /? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Kind Regards, |
| 12 |
Jaco |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On 2019/07/15 17:37, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 15 |
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 16 |
>> On 7/15/19 10:45 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote: |
| 17 |
>>> I have no idea who wrote this: |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> "The historical justification for a /bin, /sbin and /lib separate from |
| 20 |
>>> /usr no longer applies today." but I strongly disagree. |
| 21 |
>> All of that stuff is written from the perspective of "I feel like doing |
| 22 |
>> it this way in systemd, so I need to post-hoc justify making everyone |
| 23 |
>> else go along with it." |
| 24 |
> Also add this: |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> https://www.osnews.com/story/25556/understanding-the-bin-sbin-usrbin-usrsbin-split/ |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> In particular, note Rob Landley's response linked in that story. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> So, this has nothing to do with systemd at all, please stop conflating |
| 31 |
> it. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> William |
Archives