Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: ros-catkin.eclass, new USE_EXPAND: ROS_MESSAGES, new categories: dev-ros and ros-meta for review. | ||
| Date: | Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 55FBE031.7000708@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: ros-catkin.eclass, new USE_EXPAND: ROS_MESSAGES, new categories: dev-ros and ros-meta for review. by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On 09/18/2015 11:55 AM, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | > Alexis Ballier posted on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:04:19 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | >>> Keep in mind what this implies when you change these dependencies |
| 5 | >>> without bumping the ebuilds that use them. |
| 6 | >> |
| 7 | >> only way i see these changing is with a new ros_messages_*** useflag, |
| 8 | >> which will cause a rebuild anyway |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > ?? Only with --newuse or similar, tho? Otherwise USE (or USE_EXPAND |
| 11 | > here) changes don't trigger rebuilds, do they? |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Correct. It's not good to rely on this and expect users to have a |
| 15 | certain update pattern or even use a particular PM. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: ros-catkin.eclass, new USE_EXPAND: ROS_MESSAGES, new categories: dev-ros and ros-meta for review. | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |