Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Travis Tilley <lv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development'
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:33:19
1 if we must keep the 2.6 kernels seperate, i suggest that we at least
2 change the name of the package. it's incredibly confusing to have your
3 stable kernel named 'development-sources' or 'gentoo-dev-sources', and
4 there are archs like amd64 that just dont support 2.4 in any way. plus
5 with the new change in kernel development, mm-sources has become the
6 official development tree.
8 does anyone object to renaming development-sources to linux26-sources?
9 perhaps a similar name change for gentoo-dev-sources and
10 hardened-dev-sources?
13 Travis Tilley <lv@g.o>
15 --
16 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development' Cory Visi <merlin@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development' Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development' Peter Gordon <admin@×××××××××××××××××.com>