Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:56:16
Message-Id: 52D3FE8D.6010603@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team) by Tom Wijsman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 13/01/14 09:46 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
5 > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700 "C. Bergström"
6 > <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> wrote:
7 >
8 >> Long term the API to pkgcore could be beneficial, but again I'm
9 >> not sure it's a game changer for users.
10 >
11 > Long term, we should have an independent API backend that tools
12 > can query; not rewrite our tools every time users want to use them
13 > with a different package manager.
14
15 ..you mean, define the API and include it in PMS? how much
16 bureaucracy will that need to occur?
17
18
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iF4EAREIAAYFAlLT/o0ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBIlwD/UhmM7jiu0c3kbczm/p0eA0nE
23 QklKzRWkYxLpUpWEwegA/0GzTsFmUL/9C+xVvh1rpKjk23L6LAR/mWuiB34Vmnb0
24 =vpX0
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team) Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>