1 |
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:54:12 +0200 |
2 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Alex Howells wrote: |
5 |
> > On 09/03/07, Anant Narayanan <anant@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > <snip> |
7 |
> >> I forgot to add that the dev-lang/dmd-bin ebuild might also require |
8 |
> >> the special DMD license to be included in the tree. I'm attaching a |
9 |
> >> copy of the license. I'm not much of a legal person, but it seems |
10 |
> >> like this license is different from "as-is" and also prohibits |
11 |
> >> redistribution which means we would need RESTRICT="nomirror". |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > I think the key words in the license from our perspective are: |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > "The Software is copyrighted and comes with a single user license, |
16 |
> > and may not be redistributed. If you wish to obtain a redistribution |
17 |
> > license, please contact Digital Mars." |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Would it be worth contacting Digital Mars? |
20 |
> > -- Alex |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If they have a download link that works so users can download it |
23 |
> automatically, I don't see any reason why we should give away bandwidth |
24 |
> to a proprietary project. |
25 |
|
26 |
Yeah, assuming they provide versioned tarballs these days (they didn't |
27 |
when I took a look at it a few years ago). |
28 |
|
29 |
Marius |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |