Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior
Date:	Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:27:34
Message-Id:	`20060803213406.6e1d8b26@localhost`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior by Marius Mauch

1	On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:07:35 +0200
2	Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> wrote:
3
4	> Opinions?
5
6	Current behaviour is sub-optimal in many regards, but the tree relies
7	upon it; amongst other examples, packages depending upon =autoconf-2.5*
8	expect to get 2.59. If someone wants to 'fix' all of those, and any
9	other cases that may appear, I'd be for the change.
10	--
11	gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list