1 |
On Monday, September 20, 2010 23:03:54 William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:22:59AM +0000, Duncan wrote: |
3 |
> > Finally, I'm not sure it absolutely needs it, but for clarity-sake and to |
4 |
> > avoid second-guessing and debate continuing long past the point of |
5 |
> > usefulness, I believe a council vote on the issue is appropriate. I |
6 |
> > don't know where we are in the meeting cycle, but it seems to me that |
7 |
> > barring some special-case exception, a vote in 10 days or so should be |
8 |
> > plenty of time for folks to make their opinions known, so the first |
9 |
> > meeting after that looks to be appropriate for a vote, to me. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If we keep oldnet as the default, there is nothing for the council to |
12 |
> vote on as far as I can see, because stable users are covered in the |
13 |
> migration guide at http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml. |
14 |
> If they follow that path, there is nothing special they need to do |
15 |
> outside of that, so there isn't any affect. |
16 |
|
17 |
yeah, that isnt necessary. i didnt think people were actually using newnet |
18 |
and so we could punt it, but apparently i'm wrong in that regard. which means |
19 |
we either reach feature parity/simplicity between the two and merge them, or |
20 |
leave it alone if, by design, that is not feasible. |
21 |
|
22 |
oldnet may be complicated in some regards, but the fact that it easily works |
23 |
on so many diverse systems/setups means it cannot simply be culled. on s390 |
24 |
for example, network setup requires loading modules and grubbing around in |
25 |
/sys/ before the interface even exists. there is no package/script to do this |
26 |
for you and every other distro ive seen out there that supports s390 has a |
27 |
huge number of hacks in their init system to support things. whereas the |
28 |
Gentoo way is extraordinarily clean. |
29 |
-mike |