| 1 |
4.3.2006, 2:57:51, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> The whole argument here is that bailing out with conflicting use flags |
| 4 |
>> breaks some extensive compiles. So you suppose users will be sitting in |
| 5 |
>> front of their monitor and stare on the screen waiting for a scary warning? |
| 6 |
>> No, they won't. And even if they were, how exactly is that warning better |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> No they won't, but elog in portage-2.1 will gladly send them a message |
| 9 |
> via whatever configuration they have about the warning that the ebuild |
| 10 |
> produced. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Along with messages from another 127 or so ebuilds from that "extensive" |
| 13 |
compile (let alone the fact that portage 2.1 isn't stable). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'm done here, this isn't going anywhere. Feel free to join us on |
| 16 |
#gentoo-php to provide support for the resulting miscompiled code and |
| 17 |
related issues... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ktnxbye. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
jakub |
Archives