1 |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:33:21PM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 18:07 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
3 |
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:11:15AM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
5 |
> > > > You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because he |
6 |
> > > > *doesn't* give one unofficial overlay special treatment over another? |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > The jave "unofficial" overlay is well on its way to becoming an official |
9 |
> > > and officially hosted overlay. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > And once it is, it can be given special treatment. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> We're talking around each other, let's stop. I'm not advocating that |
14 |
> the overlay keywords for sunrise cease -- as I stated in another part of |
15 |
> this thread: I do not care one way or the other. I don't think it is |
16 |
> appropriate, however, to make other projects hostage because you don't |
17 |
> like what's going on with your pet project. |
18 |
|
19 |
Agreed, but I don't think there's any reading of the original message |
20 |
that allows continuing use of Gentoo's bugzilla for Java's overlay until |
21 |
it is hosted by Gentoo, so I don't consider this Jakub's decision. |
22 |
|
23 |
> > Maybe discussions have been focused on policy more than development |
24 |
> > itself, but for the most part (yes, there have been exceptions), they |
25 |
> > have still been focused on Gentoo. You seem to be making it personal, |
26 |
> > which is over the line for me. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I'm pretty sure I have not made it personal. I'm not addressing any one |
29 |
> in particular on these, nor do I have anything against any parties (or |
30 |
> for any parties for that matter). I'm sorry if you took my words that |
31 |
> way, that was certainly not the intent from this side. |
32 |
|
33 |
It was mostly the "gentoo-babies" reference to this list that I |
34 |
considered name-calling and a bit too much, even if it wasn't directed |
35 |
at any single person in particular. If I misunderstood you, sorry. |
36 |
|
37 |
> > Your frustration is understandable, but I think you took it out on the |
38 |
> > wrong message, and very possibly the wrong person. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> I know what I did, and they were both the correct target. We can take |
41 |
> this off-list and include Jakub himself in it, if you're dying to know. |
42 |
> I think Jakub himself knows full well *exactly* where I came from and |
43 |
> why. |
44 |
|
45 |
If there's something between you and Jakub that I'm not aware of, I'll |
46 |
stay out of that. It doesn't affect my opinion on this specific topic, |
47 |
though. |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |