| 1 |
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:00:38 +0300 |
| 2 |
Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Friday 01 July 2005 23:19, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 5 |
> > It also makes any attempts to parse ebuilds without using bash (our |
| 6 |
> > current strategy) a lot harder (actually causing bash |
| 7 |
> > reimplementation) |
| 8 |
> You mean you're actually doing that for portage-cvs? I didn't know |
| 9 |
> that. Does 'our current strategy' refer to using bash or to not using |
| 10 |
> it? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
He doesn't. Portage-cvs (=2.1) still uses bash and there are no plans |
| 13 |
to change that for the ebuild format. However we |
| 14 |
_might_ add support for alternate package formats in the future. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Marius |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 22 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives