1 |
On N, 2008-05-08 at 21:09 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> > e) It has been suggested the support should have been added with new |
3 |
> > EAPI instead of local build deps (some of which are missing, for |
4 |
> > instance in the hand-rolled for-no-reason-whatsoever .tar.lzma format |
5 |
> > net-tools doesn't have a dep in addition to using lzma for no good |
6 |
> > reason) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Chill, relax and cool down. |
9 |
|
10 |
Well, I said how it is. I don't see anything in it that indicates I am |
11 |
so upset and angry that I need to do these things. I did however loose |
12 |
hours of work time, but that's life. |
13 |
|
14 |
> Instead, just ask those who decided to |
15 |
> follow upstream why and if they have even thought about the issues you |
16 |
> brought up. |
17 |
|
18 |
This is what I am doing with this as well, in addition to the bug |
19 |
reports. But as this is widespread to at least 4-6 system packages, I |
20 |
brought it up here as well to ensure this is not something I have to |
21 |
fight against in overlays and time wastes continuously in the future. |
22 |
Oh and net-tools has not distributed anything in .tar.lzma, so this has |
23 |
nothing to do with following upstream in any shape or form in this case. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Mart Raudsepp |
27 |
Gentoo Developer |
28 |
Mail: leio@g.o |
29 |
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio |