Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markus Nigbur <pYrania@××××××××.de>
To: lafou@×××××××.fr
Cc: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] European Patentability rules
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:13:45
Message-Id: 20030827231334.4d70b88d.pYrania@c0ffeine.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] European Patentability rules by "Philippe Lafoucrière"
1 On 27 Aug 2003 22:33:32 +0200
2 Philippe Lafoucrière <lafou@×××××××.fr> wrote:
3
4 > will the gentoo website participate to the online manifestation ?
5 >
6 > like :
7 > http://apache.org/
8 > http://linuxfr.org
9 > Debian, Gimp, Indymedia, OpenOffice, Savannah, GNOME, KDE, Mandrake,
10 > ... 1900 websites currently
11 >
12 > more info here :
13 > http://swpat.ffii.org/
14 > http://petition.eurolinux.org/
15 >
16 >
17 > --
18 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
19 >
20 >
21 it was under discussion, but afaik got rejected.
22
23 Aug 27 21:29:06 <@cybersystem> klieber: hey, can you make a newspost or
24 whatever about the patent protest? (look at debian.org, gentoo.de,
25 gimp.org......... if you want to know what i mean)
26 Aug 27 21:33:33 <@klieber> cybersystem: personally, I don't really
27 want to get involved with that. what's been the general consensus on
28 the -core thread I haven't been following?
29 Aug 27 21:33:42 <@pfeifer|work> klieber: how about professionally?
30 Aug 27 21:33:56 <@klieber> pfeifer|work: nope -- not that way,
31 eithe.r
32 Aug 27 21:34:17 * klieber happens to support software patents.
33
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] European Patentability rules Matt Chorman <matt@×××××××××××××××.org>