Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nero-3.0.0.0 license needs RESTRICT="fetch" ?
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:44:36
Message-Id: 468E7EB6.7030804@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nero-3.0.0.0 license needs RESTRICT="fetch" ? by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
2 > On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
3 >> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
4 >>> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
5 >> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
6 >
7 > the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
8
9 This check in this particular ebuild won't add anything useful; will
10 just bug users redundantly to accept a license which they'll have to
11 accept once again on the first run. Kinda miss the point here.
12
13
14 --
15 Best regards,
16
17 Jakub Moc
18 mailto:jakub@g.o
19 GPG signature:
20 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
21 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
22
23 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Nero-3.0.0.0 license needs RESTRICT="fetch" ? "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o>