1 |
On 28/08/2018 00:46, Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> I can say that if the licenses are habitually misidentified, I could not use |
3 |
> Gentoo's portage tree in my job without extensive and ongoing revalidation of |
4 |
> the license metadata. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> There are, in fact, automated tools for advising about the license disposition |
7 |
> of these types of things, examining source files for unfortunate edits and |
8 |
> variants and flagging them, etc. It might be an interesting task at some point |
9 |
> to point some of these tools at portage, look for incorrect metadata and file |
10 |
> bug reports. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Not suggesting this is a worthwhile approach up front, but it might be a |
13 |
> useful tool in the future for dealing with license metadata quality as a |
14 |
> chronic issue. (Which, in turn, is useful for commercial consumption and |
15 |
> participation.) |
16 |
|
17 |
Given the reality of how open source project works, I believe it's up to |
18 |
people who care/need this most to do such work in Gentoo. |
19 |
|
20 |
From what I see, nobody would be opposed to _someone_ making the |
21 |
metadata more precise. On the other hand, I sense most people don't see |
22 |
enough benefit to sign up for such work themselves - which I totally |
23 |
understand. |
24 |
|
25 |
Paweł |