Archives
Archives
| From: | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusb -> virtual/libusb, please, check your overlays |
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2012 08:48:06 |
| Message-Id: | 4FBCA327.8040909@gentoo.org |
| 1 | Whole gentoo-x86 is using the virtuals now. Please check your overlays |
| 2 | to avoid dev-libs/libusb from creeping back in to the tree. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/dindex/dev-libs/libusb |
| 5 | http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/dev-libs/libusb |
| 6 | |
| 7 | If you have packages in overlays using dev-libs/libusb please fix them |
| 8 | now to avoid them creeping into Portage. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | There is a repoman bug open but still without a patch: |
| 11 | |
| 12 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/417123 |
| 13 | |
| 14 | This is important now because of the dev-libs/libusb-compat stabilization: |
| 15 | |
| 16 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/417135 |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Otherwise you'd be introducing conflicting dependencies for /stable/ users. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Futhermore some of the virtual/libusb dependencies in tree are missing |
| 21 | usage of correct SLOT, and should be fixed, that involves checking the |
| 22 | package sources (of course). If you want to help with this, please do. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Thanks, |
| 25 | Samuli |