| 1 |
On Tue, 10 May 2016 22:40:39 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> I agree, repoman should be catching this stuff. |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Then Please contribute some test ebuilds for the gen-b0rk repo to |
| 10 |
> > test repoman or any other Q/A apps with. If they fail to detect |
| 11 |
> > the test ebuilds, it will give us something to use to help trace |
| 12 |
> > the code errors. It'll also make for a much better testing system |
| 13 |
> > overall for any app performing any type of Q/A on ebuilds. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I don't think there is a repoman check for ROOT in src functions |
| 16 |
> (yet). I was just saying that I think it would make sense to add that. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
As you know, with the modular system now in place, It should be quite |
| 20 |
easy to add that check now. There is no need to figure out where in |
| 21 |
over 3000 lines of spaghetti code to insert it without messing up |
| 22 |
something else. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Make the test ebuilds, at least one good one, plus however many to test |
| 25 |
the broken parts. It should only take an hour to add that check. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |
Archives