1 |
Alexandre Buisse wrote: |
2 |
> The opensolaris project has done a similar thing[1]. The three finalists |
3 |
> were bazaar[2], mercurial[3] and git[4], and the winner was eventually |
4 |
> mercurial. This is also the recommended choice from the EuroBSDcon |
5 |
> slides, so definitely something to consider. |
6 |
|
7 |
Indeed, although EuroBSDcon didn't even analyze git, just mentioned it |
8 |
in passing. It also seems that we have a fair lack of expertise relating |
9 |
to it, but there has been no shortage of contributions about subversion |
10 |
and git, at least. |
11 |
|
12 |
The problem I had with the opensolaris testing is that they didn't seem |
13 |
to do any direct comparisons between the SCMs -- they were all isolated |
14 |
and based on a requirements doc. This makes it difficult to easily |
15 |
figure out how they balance out. |
16 |
|
17 |
There have been a fair number of changes since the version of git |
18 |
analyzed in the opensolaris testing (1.2.2). |
19 |
|
20 |
Thanks, |
21 |
Donnie |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |