Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tres Melton <tres@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:56:58
Message-Id: 1131098116.15030.71.camel@thor.tres.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting by "Nathan L. Adams"
1 On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 19:29 -0500, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
2
3 > <rant>
4 > You're just missing the fact that a flat file (or whatever it is you're
5 > clinging to; for the purpose of this rant, I shall refer to your simple
6 > data format as "flat file") has trade-offs, just like XML's trade off is
7 > parsing overhead. XML was designed to solve certain problems;
8 > portability of data, separation and portability of presentation from the
9 > data, etc. Complexity in the parser is the trade-off.
10 >
11 Perhaps I'm missing something here but I thought the concept of --news
12 is to get information in front of as many eyes as possible. It seems
13 that information could just as easily be:
14
15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 This upgrade is going to be a PITA and we highly recommend that you read
17 one (or more) of the following resources before proceeding:
18
19 http://www.gentoo.org/wherever/upgrade-instructions
20 http://forums.gentoo.org/thread=whatever
21 http://lists.gmane.org/link-to-mail-thread.
22
23 You have been warned. Have a nice day. (tm)
24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
25
26 This would have the simplicity of a flat file and all the functionality
27 of XML at once so we can eat our cake too. Just a thought.
28
29 >
30 > Nathan
31 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
32 > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
33 >
34 > iD8DBQFDaqt52QTTR4CNEQARAoQ1AJ42ItHkJ37eFUY8rSoGpN/dVoKIFACeJi7b
35 > KW6/pzn8VEKi3hO0Gqomsms=
36 > =cSQh
37 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
38
39 Best Regards,
40 --
41 Tres Melton
42 IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
43
44 --
45 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list