| 1 |
> On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:04, Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Hello, |
| 5 |
>> =20 |
| 6 |
>> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to |
| 7 |
>> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported" |
| 8 |
>> architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with |
| 9 |
>> the general architecture support in Gentoo, e.g. by having all |
| 10 |
>> architectures with stable profiles be "security supported". |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I fully support this approach and have long advocated for it. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Overall, all stables arches should be security supported and if |
| 16 |
> they begin lagging behind they should be dropped to unstable. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I am sure there are some nuances, but this is a great start. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Let's do it! |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
+1 for reasons you said + in the original proposal. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
We don't currently adhere to the stated policy verbatim |
| 25 |
anyway and I don't think it adds anything right now. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
best, |
| 28 |
sam |
Archives