| 1 |
Form #1 looks clearer than #3, but still not so clear :) |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 10/25/07, Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 18:02 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 6 |
> > These sh ``arrays'' are really just strings, right? Did you implement |
| 7 |
> > functions to take them apart? Can the same function handle forms 1 and 3? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't think we could use both. |
| 10 |
> Here's a code snippet of actually using them |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> # How baselayout-2 presently handles arrays |
| 13 |
> eval "$(_get_array array)" |
| 14 |
> for x in "$@"; do |
| 15 |
> echo "$x" |
| 16 |
> done |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> # How baselayout-2 may handle arrays based on this discussion |
| 19 |
> IFS=" |
| 20 |
> " |
| 21 |
> for x in $(_get_array array); do |
| 22 |
> unset IFS |
| 23 |
> echo "$x" |
| 24 |
> done |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Assume that the _get_array function correctly maps the bash array to the |
| 27 |
> posix shell one in both cases. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Thanks |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Roy |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives