Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jonathan Smith <smithj@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual - xlocker?
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:06:00
Message-Id: 42B204FF.5020502@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual - xlocker? by "Beber [Gentoo]"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Beber [Gentoo] wrote:
5 > Hi guys,
6 >
7 > thanks for you to look of my reply on this bug :)
8 >
9 > It don't think that a virtual need to be use here. 3 softwares for a
10 > virtual is quite less.
11 >
12 > Why are you placing a REDEPEND instead of a PDEPEND ?
13 > xautolock *doesn't need* on of theses software to compile. It need one
14 > of them to be usable. Is the side, it's a post depend.
15
16 PDEPEND is for something that is necessary, but can _only_ be compiled
17 after... RDEPEND is "run-time dependency"
18
19 - -smithj
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
22 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
23
24 iD8DBQFCsgT/l5AvwDPiUowRAuakAJ0ZjmtPUPCFGcxwy6gfujjHikFP5gCgnBie
25 AWjJrSw1rlDruvePaJnsK4w=
26 =5WRk
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list