| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:48:20 +0200 |
| 3 |
> "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 6 |
>> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > Not everyone uses bash. Not everyone cares at all about |
| 8 |
>> > bash-completion. What is your point? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I'm not saying I agree with the removal of bash-completion flag (that |
| 11 |
>> discussion is for elsewhere), but just that your analogy doesn't hold. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> zx2c4@Dell /usr/lib/systemd $ equery d bash|grep portage |
| 14 |
>> sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha120 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> As you may or may not know, portage does not use bash completion. Bash |
| 17 |
> completion is a strictly interactive-shell feature. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Pretty sure he was responding to your statement 'not everybody uses |
| 20 |
bash', not to your statement about bash completion. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
:wq |
Archives