Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-db/freetds | ||
| Date: | Thu, 27 May 2004 22:00:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1085695234.9861.8.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-db/freetds by Stuart Herbert |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 22:14 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 | > > It is questionable in itself that this package clearly had a lot of |
| 3 | > > maintenance after the introduction of metadata and it still has no |
| 4 | > > metadata.xml & set maintainership trough a herd. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Somehow, I doubt that this is particularly rare. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I doubt it too, but it still is bad that it happens. Maybe this raises |
| 9 | awareness once again. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - foser |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-db/freetds | Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> |