| 1 |
On 2 December 2017 at 23:08, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev |
| 4 |
> napisał: |
| 5 |
> > Hi, |
| 6 |
> > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib? |
| 7 |
> > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> One reason might be that: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Thanks. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> 1) there's barely any use for it, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Well, I think that whoever use hardened barely use multilib. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> 2) we have too many profiles, and |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
This has not stopped us so far. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> 3) every added profile slows down repoman & pkgcheck seriously. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Only when using '-d', no? |
| 26 |
Anyway, probably the default of hardened should be multilib so we end |
| 27 |
up with the same number. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> > [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Alon |
Archives