Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development'
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 04:04:25
Message-Id: 200408240004.16910.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development' by Peter Gordon
1 On Monday 23 August 2004 11:58 pm, Peter Gordon wrote:
2 > So perhaps they could be slotted as sys-kernel virtuals where 2.6
3 > ebuilds have a "!( =gentoo-sources-2.4* )" DEPEND and 2.4 ebuilds have a
4 > "!( =gentoo-sources-2.6* )" DEPEND or something to that effect? Then you
5 > would not be forced to upgrade, unless you replaced the virtual by
6 > unmerging one kernel branch and merging the other. Would this work out?
7
8 no, because some people switch between 2.4 and 2.6 while testing things
9
10 imho, portage should have a way to keep kernel upgrades along the major and
11 minor versions ... that is, you can upgrade from 2.4.25 to 2.4.26, but
12 portage wont try to upgrade you to 2.6.8 ... perhaps it isnt feasible atm ...
13 -mike