1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:53:20 -0800 Donnie Berkholz |
3 |
> <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> | The maintainer should be the absolute authority over his/her packages, |
5 |
> | and only the council should be able to overrule maintainer decisions |
6 |
> | in the case of disagreement between the maintainer and anybody else. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> So if the maintainer sticks SANDBOX_DISABLE="1" rm -fr / in global scope |
9 |
> and refuses to move it, QA will have to get council approval to fix it? |
10 |
|
11 |
I already addressed that in the next email in the thread. |
12 |
|
13 |
"That assumes lack of extenuating circumstances such as |
14 |
security vulnerabilities or major tree breakage." |
15 |
|
16 |
Thanks, |
17 |
Donnie |