| 1 |
Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 2 |
> With all due respect, for some reason we don't have Proctors anymore to enforce |
| 3 |
> the CoC. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The perception is that they aren't/weren't _exactly_ needed as they are, |
| 6 |
either because nobody wants the secret policy feeling or because self |
| 7 |
regulation is working almost nicely. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Thus, things we would expect the proctors to catch and handle under CoC |
| 10 |
> get sent to devrel instead. All I am doing is wondering out loud (now that CoC |
| 11 |
> is coming alive again) if we should start processing these under CoC rules. I'm |
| 12 |
> asking Council because CoC belongs to Council, but I do not expect a ruling, |
| 13 |
> just perhaps an interesting discussion. See, these things can't be caught before |
| 14 |
> they get to devrel because you ensured there would be no one to catch them --- |
| 15 |
> you are the one who wanted to kill off the proctors, after all. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Item already present I think. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> I am asking a question as a member of the devrel confres subproject and as |
| 20 |
> an interested developer. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
you know the channel and the time ^^; |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
lu |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Luca Barbato |
| 29 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 30 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 31 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives